Abuse ChatGPT and other language models for remote code execution, sounds great! This is quite literally just a case of determining how the AI is being leveraged in the backend and then engineering a prompt to ask the language model to respond with something malicious. The author has two examples on BoxCars:
The vulnerability is a Server-Side MIME Sniff issue in the answerdev/answer project (a Q&A platform) that leads to a stored XSS vulnerability. What is really interesting is that the bug primarily only appears when running the application under Docker.
This was a fun authorization check bypass because when checking if higher privileges were needed the `flag` value was checked for equality with the two privileged actions.Later on however, when deciding what handler to use to handle to request, it used a bitwise operation to check if the specific bit is set...
Three hard to exploit (beyond denial of service) out-of-bounds read vulnerabilities in MIT Kerberos V5 but each with a bit of an interest cause.
Effectively, a double-fetch vulnerability in Intel SMM's SMI handler that could allow a local attacker to escelate into System manage Mode.It recieves a `CommBuffer` that contains a `Data` pointer and a size value...
Yet another case of bad syncronization or just performing operations in the wrong order.IIn this case `ene_remove` called when removing the device, will remove its internal allocations and everything before it actually unregisters the device...
A type-confusion happens in during the initialization of TUN/TAP sockets that leads to the UID being fixed to 0.The root cause of this bug is in the incorrect assumption made by `sock_init_data() `regarding the `struct socket` input...
The XSS here is fairly basic, attacker controlled data reflected without sanitization, whats a bit more interesting is the input source, plugin metadata processed by the global Jenkin's Update Center.There is a bit of a process to getting plugins listed in the Update Center, submitted a PR and the first plugin needs to be manually approved, though the authors note that this is mostly a procedural thing...
Relatively straight forward oauth hijack/account takeover flow with one interesting aspect in actually performing the login with the hijacked OAuth code.
A long, fairly beginner friendly post about attacking a Bluetooth lock, there is a lot of process information here as it was an intern's research project. What the vulnerability comes down to though is a lack of any real authoization checking instead only validating the integrity (poorly!) of the request and trusting the app did all the heavy lifting.